One can be happy, But Can one stay happy?

Is it truly possible to be happy? Well, I think it’s obvious the answer is yes. However, In Sigmund Freud’s point of view, it is not possible. I can see what he means because we often associate happiness with pleasure. If you look at happiness in that sense, then it is not possible to be completely happy. As we discussed in previous lectures, a key component to pleasure is duration. I think Freud believes that one can never truly stay happy.

In his book, “Civilization and it’s Discontent,” Freud discusses how it is necessary to have rules in society. He believes that humans are animals and that without rules civilization would go out of control. For this reason, rules are necessary. However, can one truly be happy if rules and regulations are enforced upon them? Well, either way, one could say that without rules everyone would suffer in a chaotic world. Ironically, In Freud’s opinion a society with rules restricts individual freedom. Can an individual really be happy if they can’t do whatever they want? In some cases yes, but often times no.

An example of this can be found at work. I work in the fast food chain, and after running around all day I get hungry! To be honest, If I had the freedom, I’d go in the back and eat when it’s not busy. However, that would be against the rules. This restricts my notion of happiness. (A satisfied stomach is happiness to me) Although I’m making money, and enjoy the interactions with customers, I’m not truly happy. Or at least…my happiness doesn’t last long after my stomach grumbles.. Sometimes I do feel like my manager is unfair, and this would further prove Freud’s opinion that society is run by greedy administrators.

Being a hockey fan I can’t resist making a hockey analogy to this whole question of “Can one truly be happy?” Let’s draw back to the 2010 Winter Olympics. I recall watching Ryan Miller, the goaltender of the USA hockey team being disappointed and discontent with himself. He had just received the silver medal around his neck, yet he didn’t smile for a second. Finishing second place out of all the countries doesn’t constitute happiness I suppose. One might ask why? Well, I guess if you were to look at it in Freud’s perspective…one will never be satisfied with what they achieve. Miller wanted that Gold medal, and was discontent with his consolation prize.

Ultimately, if you forced me to view happiness through Freud’s eyes, I would say that it is not possible to be happy. I think that Freud associates happiness with freedom, and success. In that sense, of course nobody can ever be happy forever. However, I happiness CAN be achieved. Remaining happy is another story.